Reports (11)

Constituents were digging behind 247 boston. When they did the digging they left 12-15 ft pole in constituents yard. Constituent spoke to owner of property they ignored them. | Construction debris: [12-16 ft long pole] Exact location: [neighbors backyard]

Constituent reports two bags of construction materials left on the sidewalk. | Construction debris: [Two bags of mortar and shingles] Exact location: [Sidewalk next to Street Cleaning and Tow Zone sign pole]

Constituent reports that the resident at the mentioned location is placing blocks and poles/sticks on the sidewalk to restrict other persons from the area. | Construction debris: [Cement blocks] Exact location: [sidewalk]

he contractor decided to leave they're equipment here today even though the permit on the telephone pole says Sept 10-11. It bad enough that this is an area where it is difficult to park. Please make them either remove there equipment or update they're permit. Thank you | Construction debris: [construction equipment]

There is a new telephone pole and still an existing telephone pole that may be dangerous! I was told the old pole would be removed but it has been a year or longer! | Construction debris: [This isn't really debris, but I couldn't find anything exactly!]

Constituent submitted case for a pipe leaning against building (101002969597). Case was closed with a photo stating the pole was removed. Constituent reports, as seen in the photo just past the light pole, the pipe is still against building. | Construction debris: [Pipe] Exact location: [Across from address, behind St. Peter's Academy]

Construction debris: [No stopping sign left out including the pole] Exact location: [On the sidewalk in front of house]

up against the ultilty pole | Construction debris: [large piece of plywood maybe 6 feet long] Exact location: [sidewalk]

Constituent reports that there are still 2 poles in front of 60-62 W Rutland Sq. This case has been put in two times before - once where it said the poles were removed, but they werent, and the second time where they could not find the poles, but they are still there. The picture attached to the case that code enforcement sent back was of her address, but that is not the address with the poles. The poles are in front of 60-62 W Rutland SQ | Construction debris: [two 6 ft-long metal poles] Exact location: [On street between the car and curb]

Constituent called again to say that the case was closed without getting resolved. it was about two poles are infront of 60-62 W Rutland sq. | Construction debris: [two 6 ft-long mteal poles] Exact location: [on the street,between car and curb]