Reports (63)
-
Other
Intersection Of Englewood Ave And Sutherland Rd, Brighton, MaThe pedestrian lights at this intersection do not come on automatically with parallel traffic. One block further, pedestrian signals are automatic. Requiring pedestrians to use a beg button to cross the street treats them as second-class users of public streets and is a barrier to access for anyone with limited mobility. We already give cars the first class status of a green light by default, without forcing them to wait (which might help slow down unsafe traffic speeds on Sutherland), but not giving pedestrians the parallel light is even worse. The user entered the address: 24 Sutherland Rd, Boston, MA 02135, USA to see more details visit: http://seeclickfix.com/issues/4887108
CLOSED #101002654552Case Resolved. A BTD traffic signal technician was sent to this intersection and set the concurrent pedestrian phase to automatic recall.
-
Other
Intersection Of Dartmouth St And Commonwealth Ave, Boston, MaNone of the Commonwealth Mall crossings of the alphabet streets (Arlington, Berkeley, Clarendon, Dartmouth, Exeter, Fairfield, Gloucester, Hereford) have crosswalks or indicators when it's safe to cross. Inexplicably, all intersections follow different patterns for who has concurrent green lights -- sometimes Comm in one direction and the sidestreet at the other side are green concurrently (perhaps for turning traffic?), creating a situation where pedestrians think it's safe to cross and it isn't. What's the vision for how pedestrians are supposed to use this as a corridor? Cross to the outside of Comm Ave (where the pedestrian signals are) at every block? This does not seem feasible.
CLOSED #101002062249Case Noted. Pedestrians should cross in marked crosswalks.
-
Traffic Signal Repair
Intersection Of Berkeley St And Newbury St, Boston, MaIn the back bay area. The pedestrians signals should all go at the same time. There are many instances especially during rush hour that vehicles making turns... for example Berkeley and Boylston. The vehicles turning left onto Berkeley only one or two vehicle actually turn per cycle because of pedestrian crossing. Having the pedestrian signals all go at the same time would probably help alleviate some of that traffic in the back bay area. And other areas in the city ass well | Signal problem: [Pedestrian Signal]
CLOSED #101001880615Case Noted. The signal phasing at this location runs a concurrent pedestrian phase. While this phasing may impact turning vehicles it reduces the overall delay for vehicles on all approaches and also for pedestrians. Running an exclusive pedestrian phase at this location would increase the delay to vehicles on all approaches. BTD uses phasing where feasible as it allows for more time for pedestrians to cross and reduces overall delay to motorists.
-
Other
155 Seaport Blvd, 11, Boston, Ma, 02210I walk all over the Seaport District, primarily down Congress Street from Seaport West to downtown. The walk signs come on at intersections where cars have lights telling them they can turn left making it treacherous to cross. There are many intersections where this is true making it necessary for someone to take a walk through the area to see what I mean. Happy to get together with you and show you where some of the problems are -- give me a call at 617-607-5995. |
CLOSED #101001518790Case Noted. These "WALK" signals are concurrent and are what pedestrian advocacy groups such as "WALK BOSTON" prefer since it cuts down delay for pedestrians.
-
Other
223 231 Berkeley St, Boston, Ma, 02116Green light and walk signal occurring simultaneously at corner of Berkeley and Boylston. Accident waiting to happen. People and cars go at the same time.
CLOSED #101001439518Case Noted. Thank you for contacting the Boston Transportation Department (BTD) regarding your request to replace concurrent pedestrian crossing with exclusive pedestrian crossings at Berkeley Street & Boylston Street. Over the years, BTD is developing traffic signal timing and phasing that reduces delays for vehicles, cyclists, and pedestrians. Part of this strategy is to remove exclusive pedestrian phases and replace with concurrent pedestrian phases where engineering reviews show it is safe to do so. While an exclusive pedestrian phase provides pedestrians sole access to an intersection without potential conflicts with turning vehicles, exclusive pedestrian phases can also lead to the following negative issues: 1. Pedestrians will often have to wait a long time for an exclusive pedestrian phase. As a result, many pedestrians will simply choose to ignore the signal and cross if and when a gap in traffic occurs. 2. An exclusive pedestrian phase may increase the overall cycle length of the intersection, thus increasing delay for all users. Since converting many Back Bay traffic signals to concurrent pedestrian crossings, BTD has been able to reduce the cycle lengths by 10 seconds each time of day at most locations. With concurrent signals, pedestrians usually have more crossing opportunities and shorter waits. BTD's criteria to use exclusive pedestrian phases include: 1 Restricted turning sight distance 2 Intersection geometry dictates that concurrent pedestrian crossings may be confusing or dangerous 3 Intersections defined within "safety zones" near elderly housing, schools, playgrounds, health facilities, etc. 4 Vehicle/pedestrian crashes It should also be noted that BTD received requests to replace exclusive pedestrian phases with concurrent crossings in the Back Bay by the community and pedestrian advocate groups to reduce pedestrian wait times. BTD recently conducted a signal retiming study of the Back Bay. As part of the study, BTD conducted an inventory of missing Yield to Peds on Turn Signs at concurrent crossings. BTD will be installing missing signs over the summer months. Whether posted or not, it is required by Mass. General Laws for turning vehicles to yield to pedestrians legally in the crosswalk when they have a Walk/Flashing Don't Walk indication. If you are observing drivers not obeying this law, BTD suggests contacting the Boston Police Department, D4 Station, and request increased enforcement on this issue at specific locations you are encountering this infraction.
-
General Traffic Engineering Request
84 Commonwealth Ave, Boston, Ma, 02116caller notes that about two years ago pedestrian crossing signals were altered to concur with the parallel traffic signals instead of keeping cars staionary while people crossed. Now there is a conflict w/ turning vehicles "at almost every intersection in the Back Bay" since drivers are too agressive to let pedestrians with the WALK signals cross legally and safety. Would like to see the signals returned to an "all stop" configuration |
CLOSED #101001417733Case Noted. Dear Ms. Levendis, Thank you for contacting the Boston Transportation Department (BTD) regarding your request to replace concurrent pedestrian crossing with exclusive pedestrian crossings in the Back Bay neighborhood. Over the years, BTD is developing traffic signal timing and phasing that reduces delays for vehicles, cyclists, and pedestrians. Part of this strategy is to remove exclusive pedestrian phases and replace with concurrent pedestrian phases where engineering reviews show it is safe to do so. While an exclusive pedestrian phase provides pedestrians sole access to an intersection without potential conflicts with turning vehicles, exclusive pedestrian phases can also lead to the following negative issues: 1. Pedestrians will often have to wait a long time for an exclusive pedestrian phase. As a result, many pedestrians will simply choose to ignore the signal and cross if and when a gap in traffic occurs. 2. An exclusive pedestrian phase may increase the overall cycle length of the intersection, thus increasing delay for all users. Since converting many Back Bay traffic signals to concurrent pedestrian crossings, BTD has been able to reduce the cycle lengths by 10 seconds each time of day at most locations. With concurrent signals, pedestrians usually have more crossing opportunities and shorter waits. BTD's criteria to use exclusive pedestrian phases include: 1 Restricted turning sight distance 2 Intersection geometry dictates that concurrent pedestrian crossings may be confusing or dangerous 3 Intersections defined within "safety zones" near elderly housing, schools, playgrounds, health facilities, etc. 4 Vehicle/pedestrian crashes It should also be noted that BTD received requests to replace exclusive pedestrian phases with concurrent crossings in the Back Bay by the community and pedestrian advocate groups to reduce pedestrian wait times. BTD recently conducted a signal retiming study of the Back Bay. As part of the study, BTD conducted an inventory of missing Yield to Peds on Turn Signs at concurrent crossings. BTD will be installing missing signs over the summer months. Whether posted or not, it is required by Mass. General Laws for turning vehicles to yield to pedestrians legally in the crosswalk when they have a Walk/Flashing Don't Walk indication. If you are observing drivers not obeying this law, BTD suggests contacting the Boston Police Department, D4 Station, and request increased enforcement on this issue at specific locations you are encountering this infraction.
-
Other
Intersection Of Beacon St And Massachusetts Ave, Boston, MaCould you please make the walk signals to cross Mass Ave (at Beacon St) automatic at all times of the day. The signals are concurrent but seem to require you to press the button, at least some of the time, which is very confusing and inconvenient. I observed people try to cross at 8:15 pm and they seemed confused as to why they didn't have a walk signal even though Beacon St had a green light. Thank you.
CLOSED #101001337049 -
Other
Intersection Of Beach St And Washington St, Boston, MaThe traffic signal at Washington St/Lagrange St/Beach St needs to have some protected/concurrent walk phases added. The walk signals to cross Lagrange St and Beach St rest in "walk" when Washington St has a green light. However, when Lagrange St or Beach St has a green light, most of the signals say "don't walk" when there is no vehicle conflict and they should say "walk". Can you please add/change the following? 1. When Lagrange St has a green light, the southern crosswalk to cross Washington St should say "walk" and the crosswalk to cross Beach St should say "walk". 2. When Beach St has a green light, both crosswalks to cross Washington St should say "walk" and the crosswalk to cross Lagrange St should say "walk". Thank you.
CLOSED #101001216482 -
Other
Intersection Of Washington St And Lagrange St, Boston, MaTwo issues with the ped signals to cross Lagrange St and Beach St. (1) During the exclusive walk phase, the walk signals do not come on. (2) During the concurrent walk phase (when Washington St has a green), the walk signals end too early.
CLOSED #101001195168 -
Other
Intersection Of Northern Ave And Ramp St And Boston Fish Pier, Boston, MaCan you please make all the walk signals at Northern Ave and D St/Fish Pier concurrent? The wait to cross any of the crossings currently is quite long. Thank you. | Case (SR) Type: [Aircraft Noise/Massport] Referred To: [MASSPORT]
OPEN #101001189339
Filters
Search
- concurrent signals (Remove)
Ticket Type
- Other (47)
- General Traffic Engineering Request (8)
- Damaged Sign (3)
- Streetlights (2)
- Traffic Signal Repair (2)
- Student Move-in Issues (1)